interesting article Giraut Juan Carlos, a English journalist, where he develops very well the aims of liberalism in (and) the company, compared to other types of ideologies (right and left .)
This post is dedicated to a fellow blogger, that "comrade." See if so, makes it to distinguish liberalism from the right and left. And again not confuse governments Sanguinetti, Lacalle and Batlle with liberalism or neoliberalism.
If at this point ... we can not go with these lessons still ......
Liberalism, Left and Right.
Juan Carlos Giraut
"The liberal position will always have the advantage over the socialist, the object of attention: study, understand and develop first the conditions under which societies generate wealth. Redistributive concern can only come later. It should reduce the endless economic debate between the left and liberalism to two different emphases: the former applies to the redistribution of wealth, the second to the conditions of its creation. As for the positions uncivilized-left or right, are unrelated to liberalism. They have to do with the physical and spiritual annihilation of the adversary and the plundering of the public. Their marks are ideological screen, or the result of international alliances, or tyrannical caprice. The Castro regime exemplifies, for having extended his ignominy for half a century, not only all that all this cruelty and greed, but also the three reasons of ideological affiliation.
back to reasonable people and the two emphases, the liberal position will always have the advantage over the socialist, the object of attention, study, understand and develop first the conditions under which societies generate wealth. Redistributive concern can only come later. This is a logical necessity, not an ideological bias.
Governments can implement liberal policies regardless of the label their parties to stand for election. Conversely, as you know our liberal hatching, decanted into the Austrian and adequately informed and advised of the presence of socialists in all parties.
Since the seventies, which deified Keynes have a problem, whose first manifestation was the stagflation or simultaneous unemployment and inflation skyrocketing. With the consequent futility of the whole model of corrections, based on encouragement or enervation of demand, as needed, from political power.
If stagflation was a new phenomenon, what has happened since then, especially the rapid increase of interdependencies at the global level we call "globalization" are little more than useless classic recipes from the left. Again, the left civilized. The other-and its counterpart, the right-are uncivilized matter for the police or the army.
One of the greatest services that hatching young are paying a liberal society is the dissemination of this idea: liberalism is not simply opposed to left, is opposed to left and right too interventionist. The adverb matter, as there is and should have been. Always required liberals to protect life and property of individuals. Today it extends the desire (and consolidation) to public health systems and training. Coexisting systems, of course, education and private healthcare.
market alone generates wealth. Once generated, companies may choose to governments committed to the equalization of opportunities. Most liberals, here and now, they sign it. Not so, despite appearances, the clueless left, determined to match results and individual merit disdain.
0 comments:
Post a Comment